‘Mavcom, the cause for Malaysian aviation sector failure’

‘Mavcom, the cause for Malaysian aviation sector failure’

PUCHONG: AirAsia Group CEO Tony Fernandes blamed the Malaysian Aviation Commission (Mavcom) for causing the failure of Malaysia’s aviation sector. 

He backed his accusations with seven reasons, including bureaucratic red tapes.

“Some of the requirements imposed by Mavcom include airlines notifying other local airlines on new route applications which is a time-consuming and unnecessary process; a three times a week limit on submissions of route applications; and the introduction of a six-month ‘cooling-off’ period for re-submission of rejected applications,” he said.

In the latest round of attack on the commission, Fernandes claimed that Mavcom, on many occasions, rejected several route applications even though bilateral traffic rights are available with other countries.

“In other words, Mavcom is rejecting applications on bilaterally-unrestricted routes. This is a blatantly unfair practice,” he posted on LinkedIn, a social media platform geared towards professionals.

“In the past, the Ministry of Transport (MoT) granted approvals as long as Air Service Agreements are in place. And it is definitely not Mavcom’s function to determine whether airlines will ultimately utilise the approved traffic rights,” he said in the post entitled: “Mavcom — A dysfunctional entity.”

The commission established on March 1, 2016, under the Malaysian Aviation Commission Act 2015 is meant to regulate economic and commercial matters related to civil aviation in Malaysia.

“It is supposed to be an independent entity to regulate economic and commercial matters related to civil aviation in Malaysia.

“However, they have failed to discharge their duties effectively and fairly,” he said. 

He claimed that Mavcom only added cost burden to travelers.

“A RM1 ‘Regulatory Service Charge’ is imposed on all passengers flying out of airports in Malaysia, in addition to the Passenger Service Charges (PSC) and Departure Levy.

“This is an unnecessary burden for passengers who collectively are paying close to RM30 million a year to cover the operating costs of a regulator who does not represent their best interest,” he said.

He also saw red over Mavcom’s failure to introduce Service Level Agreements between airport operators and airlines which was announced 2018 that was meant “to ensure the continuous growth and sustainability of the aviation industry.”

“Without an SLA, airlines are left with no recourse to address the numerous operational issues such as those at klia2. These include, frequent unplanned runway closures, uneven aprons and taxiways, and a poor airport design that requires long walks to gates and subsequent delays for passengers trying to get to their flights,” he said.

Fernandes further accused Mavcom of failing to understand and appreciate the low cost model that AirAsia has introduced to the Malaysian aviation sector.

“In October 2019, Mavcom will announce the new PSC rates (effective January 2020) which were developed in accordance with the Regulated Asset Base (RAB) Framework.

“In 2017, Mavcom removed the distinction of klia2 which has a lower PSC when they amended the aviation services charges.

“And now there seems to be an inclination to group KLIA and klia2 together, which would re-equalise international PSC rates for both airports. While the tariff options and rates have yet to be finalised, the new framework could negate the Cabinet’s recent decision to reduce the international PSC rates (beyond Asean) for all airports in Malaysia, except KLIA,” he said.

Despite that the low-cost carrier segment had grown by an average of 16 per cent, close to triple the growth of full-service carriers and now accounting for 50 per cent share of air travel in Asean.

More specifically he accused the senior management of Mavcom for resisting the change the customer preference in air travel.

“Much of this is due to its senior management being appointed from organisations such as Malaysia Airlines or Khazanah Nasional. Its chief operating officer, Azmir Zain formerly lead aviation investments at Khazanah Nasional. Breaking down barriers to a man with this kind of legacy is no easy feat,” he alleged.

Fernandes’ final shot was that Mavcom’s function was duplicative of other agencies.

For regulatory-related matters such as route approvals, the MoT and the Civil Aviation Authority of Malaysia (CAAM) are well placed to assume existing responsibility from Mavcom. 

“(Likewise), the Ministry of Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs can undertake consumer protection-related matters. 

“Disputes on aviation-related matters should and can be resolved via arbitration or mediation, failing which the affected parties would be able to resort to legal proceedings.

“In the last aspect, and as many will know, Mavcom has failed in its statutory duty to mediate the dispute between AirAsia Group and Malaysia Airports Holdings Bhd with regards to the PSC,” he said.